Ocean city md dating
With regard to the first, Mexico asserted from 1836 to 1845, perhaps a bit inflexibly that the secession of Texas was illegitimate, and it reaffirmed its right to reincorporate this part of its territory by any means necessary, including the use of force.
Furthermore, it considered that despite the recognition Texans had gained in other countries, the conflict was an internal problem.
And in 1847, Santa Anna would face the constant suspicion of treason, which prevented him from establishing direct contact with Nicholas Trist after the Cerro Gordo defeat.Thus, all confronted opposition forces that questioned their legitimacy and were eager to overthrow them.As a result of these conditions, the problems of the separation of Texas and its annexation to the United States, as well as John Slidell's mission, became part of the debate among political parties and factions and a pretext for one faction or another to downplay the legitimacy of its opponents.The federal republican government was finally restored in 1847, after six presidents had succeeded one another from June 1844 to September 1847.
With the exception of Manuel de la Peña y Peña, the rest came to power as a result of popular or military uprisings against their predecessors.
Thus, when the Mexican government learned of the treaty signed between Texas and the United States in April 1844, it reaffirmed the posture it had expressed a year before that Mexico would consider such an act "a declaration of war." And later, when the Congress approved the joint resolution inviting Texas to join the United States, Mexico suspended diplomatic relations with its neighbor.